Satversmes tiesa (ST) ir atzinusi par Satversmei neatbilsto\u0161u normu, kas prasa priv\u0101to augstskolu un koled\u017eu studiju programmas \u012bstenot valsts valod\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tiesa nosprieda, ka normas neatbilst Satversmes 112. un 113. pantam, ta\u010du atsevi\u0161\u0137\u0101 liet\u0101 tiks skat\u012bts jaut\u0101jums par \u0161o normu atbilst\u012bbu Satversmes 1. un 105. pantam. \u0160aj\u0101 liet\u0101 ST apsver iesp\u0113ju v\u0113rsties Eiropas Savien\u012bbas Ties\u0101 (EST) ar prejudici\u0101lu jaut\u0101jumu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Par neatbilsto\u0161u Satversmei atz\u012bta Augstskolu likuma 56.panta tre\u0161\u0101 da\u013ca un p\u0101rejas noteikumu 49. punkts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u0160\u0101ds l\u0113mums pamatots ar to, ka likumdev\u0113js nav izv\u0113rt\u0113jis alternat\u012bvus risin\u0101jumus, kas var\u0113tu b\u016bt maz\u0101k ierobe\u017eojo\u0161i.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
ST ar\u012b nol\u0113ma, ka apstr\u012bd\u0113t\u0101s normas par sp\u0113k\u0101 neeso\u0161\u0101m atz\u012btas no 2021. gada 1. maija.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Attiec\u012bgi spriedum\u0101 skaidrots, ka liet\u0101 ir divi pamatjaut\u0101jumi \u2013 par priv\u0101to augstskolu ties\u012bb\u0101m nodarboties ar uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113jdarb\u012bbu un par augst\u0101k\u0101s izgl\u012bt\u012bbas studiju programmu \u012bsteno\u0161anu sve\u0161valod\u0101s priv\u0101taj\u0101s augstskol\u0101s. ST katru no \u0161iem ierobe\u017eojumiem izv\u0113rt\u0113ja atsevi\u0161\u0137i, visupirms apl\u016bkojot apstr\u012bd\u0113to normu atbilst\u012bbu ties\u012bb\u0101m uz \u012bpa\u0161umu, tostarp tiesisk\u0101s pa\u013c\u0101v\u012bbas principa kontekst\u0101. P\u0113c tam tiesa v\u0113rt\u0113ja apstr\u012bd\u0113to normu atbilst\u012bbu ties\u012bb\u0101m uz izgl\u012bt\u012bbu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
ST secin\u0101ja, ka izskat\u0101maj\u0101 liet\u0101 tiesisk\u0101s pa\u013c\u0101v\u012bbas princips ir cie\u0161i saist\u012bts ar iesp\u0113jamo \u012bpa\u0161uma ties\u012bbu ierobe\u017eojumu. T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di, p\u0101rbaudot iesp\u0113jamo personas \u012bpa\u0161uma ties\u012bbu ierobe\u017eojumu, tas apl\u016bkojams kopsakar\u0101 ar tiesisk\u0101s pa\u013c\u0101v\u012bbas principu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
ST nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka Satversmes 105. pant\u0101 ietvert\u0101s ties\u012bbas uz \u012bpa\u0161umu aptver ikviena ties\u012bbas izmantot savu \u012bpa\u0161umu, tostarp, nodarbojoties ar uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113jdarb\u012bbu. \u0160o ties\u012bbu konkretiz\u0101ciju ietekm\u0113 ES ties\u012bbas, kas ir neat\u0146emama Latvijas ties\u012bbu sist\u0113mas sast\u0101vda\u013ca. L\u012bguma par Eiropas Savien\u012bbas darb\u012bbu (LESD) 49. pants noteic ES dal\u012bbvalstu pilso\u0146u br\u012bv\u012bbu veikt uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113jdarb\u012bbu. L\u012bdz ar to Satversmes 105. pants ir konkretiz\u0113jams kopsakar\u0101 ar \u0161aj\u0101 norm\u0101 ietverto uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113jdarb\u012bbas br\u012bv\u012bbu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Spriedum\u0101 atz\u012bm\u0113ts, ka EST jau iepriek\u0161 ir l\u0113musi, ka studiju programmu \u012bsteno\u0161ana par atl\u012bdz\u012bbu var ietilpt br\u012bv\u012bbas veikt uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113jdarb\u012bbu piem\u0113ro\u0161anas jom\u0101. Ta\u010du t\u0101s izskat\u012b\u0161an\u0101 \u0161obr\u012bd atrodas lieta par Ung\u0101rijas augst\u0101k\u0101s izgl\u012bt\u012bbas regul\u0113jumu, kas ir saist\u012bta ar ties\u012bbu jaut\u0101jumiem, kuriem var b\u016bt b\u016btiska noz\u012bme konkretiz\u0113jot Satversmes 105. pantu izskat\u0101maj\u0101 liet\u0101. T\u0101d\u0113\u013c ST nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka izskat\u0101maj\u0101 liet\u0101 visupirms b\u016btu nepiecie\u0161ams noskaidrot LESD 49. pant\u0101 ietvert\u0101s uz\u0146\u0113m\u0113jdarb\u012bbas br\u012bv\u012bbas saturu, vienlaikus apsverot jaut\u0101jumu par to, vai ST nav pien\u0101kums v\u0113rsties EST ar l\u016bgumu sniegt prejudici\u0101lu nol\u0113mumu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
ST spriedum\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka ties\u012bbas uz augst\u0101ko izgl\u012bt\u012bbu atz\u012bstamas par vienu no ties\u012bbu uz izgl\u012bt\u012bbu aspektiem. Augst\u0101k\u0101 izgl\u012bt\u012bba apvieno divus savstarp\u0113ji nenodal\u0101mus aspektus \u2013 izgl\u012bt\u012bbas procesu un zin\u0101tnisko darb\u012bbu un p\u0113tniec\u012bbu. T\u0101d\u0113\u013c, \u0146emot v\u0113r\u0101 augst\u0101k\u0101s izgl\u012bt\u012bbas cie\u0161o saist\u012bbu ar zin\u0101tnisk\u0101s, m\u0101ksliniecisk\u0101s un citas jaunrades br\u012bv\u012bbu, k\u0101 ar\u012b Satversmes vienot\u012bbas principu, liet\u0101 nepiecie\u0161ams izv\u0113rt\u0113t apstr\u012bd\u0113to normu atbilst\u012bbu Satversmes 112. pantam kopsakar\u0101 ar Satversmes 113. pantu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ties\u012bbas uz izgl\u012bt\u012bbu augst\u0101k\u0101s izgl\u012bt\u012bbas pak\u0101p\u0113 nav iesp\u0113jams realiz\u0113t bez m\u0101c\u012bbsp\u0113ku un stud\u0113jo\u0161o akad\u0113misk\u0101s br\u012bv\u012bbas un izgl\u012bt\u012bbas iest\u0101\u017eu autonomijas. Satversmes 112. un 113. pant\u0101 ietvert\u0101 akad\u0113misk\u0101 br\u012bv\u012bba saist\u0101ma ar augstskolu m\u0101c\u012bbsp\u0113ku ties\u012bb\u0101m br\u012bvi veikt p\u0113t\u012bjumus tiem interes\u0113jo\u0161\u0101s jom\u0101s, apmain\u012bties ar idej\u0101m un paust savus viedok\u013cus. T\u0101pat akad\u0113misk\u0101 br\u012bv\u012bba aptver stud\u0113jo\u0161o ties\u012bbas nodarboties ar zin\u0101tnisko jaunradi un izv\u0113l\u0113ties studiju virzienu un programmu valsts izveidot\u0101s izgl\u012bt\u012bbas sist\u0113mas ietvar\u0101. \u0160\u012bs ties\u012bbas nepiecie\u0161amas, lai augst\u0101k\u0101 izgl\u012bt\u012bba veicin\u0101tu sabiedr\u012bbas labkl\u0101j\u012bbu un ilgtsp\u0113j\u012bgu att\u012bst\u012bbu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Augstskolu stud\u0113jo\u0161o un m\u0101c\u012bbsp\u0113ku akad\u0113misk\u0101s br\u012bv\u012bbas \u012bsteno\u0161anai un aizsardz\u012bbai nepiecie\u0161amas ar autonomiju apvelt\u012btas augstskolas. Augstskolas savas autonomijas ietvaros var pie\u0146emt no \u0101r\u0113j\u0101 spiediena br\u012bvus l\u0113mumus akad\u0113misk\u0101s br\u012bv\u012bbas nodro\u0161in\u0101\u0161anai, atz\u012bts spriedum\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u0145emot v\u0113r\u0101 pieteikum\u0101 sniegtos argumentus un citus lietas materi\u0101lus, ST nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka izskat\u0101maj\u0101 liet\u0101 v\u0113rt\u0113jama apstr\u012bd\u0113to normu atbilst\u012bba Satversmei tikt\u0101l, cikt\u0101l t\u0101s attiecas uz priv\u0101to augstskolu m\u0101c\u012bbsp\u0113ku un stud\u0113jo\u0161o, k\u0101 ar\u012b priv\u0101to augstskolu Satversm\u0113 ietvertaj\u0101m ties\u012bb\u0101m.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
V\u0113rt\u0113jot Augstskolu likuma 5. pant\u0101 ietvert\u0101 priv\u0101to augstskolu uzdevuma izkopt un att\u012bst\u012bt valsts valodu atbilst\u012bbu Satversmei, ST secin\u0101ja, ka valstij ir pien\u0101kums izveidot t\u0101du augst\u0101k\u0101s izgl\u012bt\u012bbas sist\u0113mu, kas nodro\u0161ina izgl\u012bt\u012bbas iest\u0101\u017eu darb\u012bbu visas sabiedr\u012bbas interes\u0113s. Ar Augstskolu likuma 5. pant\u0101 ietverto uzdevumu izkopt un att\u012bst\u012bt valsts valodu, likumdev\u0113js ir konkretiz\u0113jis valsts pozit\u012bvo pien\u0101kumu, radot t\u0101du augst\u0101k\u0101s izgl\u012bt\u012bbas regul\u0113jumu, kas noteic augstskolu darb\u012bbu sabiedr\u012bbas interes\u0113s. L\u012bdz ar to Augstskolu likuma 5. panta pirm\u0101s da\u013cas tre\u0161ais teikums atbilst Satversmes 112. pantam kopsakar\u0101 ar Satversmes 113. pantu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
ST ar\u012b secin\u0101ja, ka Augstskolu likuma 56.panta tre\u0161\u0101 da\u013ca un p\u0101rejas noteikumu 49. punkts ierobe\u017eo priv\u0101to augstskolu m\u0101c\u012bbsp\u0113ku akad\u0113misko br\u012bv\u012bbu izstr\u0101d\u0101t un doc\u0113t studiju kursus sve\u0161valod\u0101s Latvijas priv\u0101taj\u0101s augstskol\u0101s, jo \u0161is regul\u0113jums ietekm\u0113 augstskolu m\u0101c\u012bbsp\u0113ku iesp\u0113ju iesaist\u012bties studiju programm\u0101s sve\u0161valod\u0101s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tiesa nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka l\u012bdz\u012bgi k\u0101 cit\u0101s izgl\u012bt\u012bbas pak\u0101p\u0113s ar\u012b augst\u0101kaj\u0101 izgl\u012bt\u012bb\u0101 no Satversmes 112. un 113. pant\u0101 ietvertaj\u0101m ties\u012bb\u0101m neizriet ties\u012bbas pras\u012bt akredit\u0113t studiju programmas sev v\u0113lam\u0101 sve\u0161valod\u0101 un ieg\u016bt valsts atz\u012btu augst\u0101k\u0101s izgl\u012bt\u012bbas diplomu par sekm\u012bgu \u0161\u0101du studiju programmu apguvi. Ta\u010du Augstskolu likuma 56. panta tre\u0161\u0101 da\u013ca un p\u0101rejas noteikumu 49. punkts ierobe\u017eo to stud\u0113jo\u0161o ties\u012bbas, kas jau uz\u0146emti pirms apstr\u012bd\u0113to normu sp\u0113k\u0101 st\u0101\u0161an\u0101s izveidotaj\u0101s sve\u0161valod\u0101s \u012bstenotaj\u0101s studiju programm\u0101s. \u0160\u012bs apstr\u012bd\u0113t\u0101s normas rada situ\u0101ciju, kur\u0101, izmantojot ties\u012bbas p\u0101rtraukt studijas un p\u0113c tam t\u0101s ats\u0101kt, atsevi\u0161\u0137i stud\u0113jo\u0161ie var neieg\u016bt diplomu par augst\u0101ko izgl\u012bt\u012bbu, jo, beidzoties p\u0101rejas noteikumos noteiktajam termi\u0146am, augstskola t\u0101du vairs neb\u016bs ties\u012bga izsniegt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Spriedum\u0101 atz\u012bm\u0113ts, ka Augstskolu likuma 56. panta tre\u0161\u0101 da\u013ca ierobe\u017eo priv\u0101t\u0101s augstskolas studiju programmu sve\u0161valod\u0101s veido\u0161an\u0101 un \u012bsteno\u0161an\u0101, jo tas iesp\u0113jams tikai \u0161aj\u0101 norm\u0101 noteiktajos gad\u012bjumos. T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di Augstskolu likuma 56. panta tre\u0161\u0101 da\u013ca un p\u0101rejas noteikumu 49. punkts ierobe\u017eo priv\u0101to augstskolu autonomiju.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
ST secin\u0101ja, ka apstr\u012bd\u0113to normu pie\u0146em\u0161anas process atbilst labas likumdo\u0161anas principam. Apstr\u012bd\u0113t\u0101s normas vair\u0101kk\u0101rt tika apl\u016bkotas Saeimas atbild\u012bgaj\u0101 komisij\u0101. T\u0101s ar\u012b uzskat\u0101mas par da\u013cu no ilgsto\u0161i \u012bstenotas izgl\u012bt\u012bbas reformas, kuras ietvaros diskut\u0113ts ar\u012b par apstr\u012bd\u0113to regul\u0113jumu. Kaut ar\u012b likumdev\u0113js \u0161\u0137ietami nav v\u0113rt\u0113jis apstr\u012bd\u0113to normu atbilst\u012bbu ES ties\u012bb\u0101m, apstr\u012bd\u0113t\u0101s normas izskat\u0101m\u0101s lietas kontekst\u0101 regul\u0113 jomu, kas ir ES dal\u012bbvalstu kompetenc\u0113. Turkl\u0101t ST nesaskat\u012bja pamatu atz\u012bt, ka gad\u012bjum\u0101, ja, pie\u0146emot apstr\u012bd\u0113t\u0101s normas, izgl\u012bt\u012bbas jom\u0101 tiktu izv\u0113rt\u0113ta to atbilst\u012bba ES ties\u012bb\u0101m, Saeima b\u016btu pie\u0146\u0113musi cit\u0101du l\u0113mumu. T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di ST atzina, ka pamatties\u012bbu ierobe\u017eojums ir noteikts ar likumu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Apstr\u012bd\u0113t\u0101s normas stiprina valsts valodas lomu augst\u0101kaj\u0101 izgl\u012bt\u012bb\u0101. T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di to rad\u012bt\u0101 pamatties\u012bbu ierobe\u017eojuma le\u0123it\u012bmie m\u0113r\u0137i ir demokr\u0101tiskas iek\u0101rtas un citu personu ties\u012bbu aizsardz\u012bba, uzsv\u0113rts spriedum\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
ST ar\u012b secin\u0101ja, ka ar apstr\u012bd\u0113taj\u0101m norm\u0101m rad\u012btais pamatties\u012bbu ierobe\u017eojums ir piem\u0113rots le\u0123it\u012bmo m\u0113r\u0137u sasnieg\u0161anai, jo apstr\u012bd\u0113t\u0101s normas uzlabo stud\u0113jo\u0161o valsts valodas prasmes, k\u0101 ar\u012b stiprina latvie\u0161u valodas lomu zin\u0101tn\u0113 un izkopj t\u0101s lietojumu da\u017e\u0101d\u0101s zin\u0101tnes nozar\u0113s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tom\u0113r ST atzina, ka past\u0101v saudz\u0113jo\u0161\u0101ki l\u012bdzek\u013ci le\u0123it\u012bm\u0101 m\u0113r\u0137a sasnieg\u0161anai. Par vienu no t\u0101diem atz\u012bstams visaptvero\u0161s visu priv\u0101to augstskolu kvalit\u0101tes izv\u0113rt\u0113jums, uz kura pamata tiktu pie\u0161\u0137irta at\u013cauja \u012bstenot studiju programmas sve\u0161valod\u0101s. Kaut ar\u012b ar augstskolu un studiju programmu akredit\u0101ciju jau \u0161obr\u012bd tiek izv\u0113rt\u0113ta priv\u0101to augstskolu sniegt\u0101s augst\u0101k\u0101s izgl\u012bt\u012bbas kvalit\u0101te, \u0161ajos procesos netiek veikts izv\u0113rt\u0113jums par to, vai konkr\u0113t\u0101 priv\u0101t\u0101 augstskola nodro\u0161ina pietiekami kvalitat\u012bvu augst\u0101ko izgl\u012bt\u012bbu, lai dr\u012bkst\u0113tu \u012bstenot studiju programmas sve\u0161valod\u0101s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
T\u0101pat ar\u012b regul\u0113jums, kas atsevi\u0161\u0137\u0101m zin\u0101tnes nozar\u0113m vai noteikta l\u012bme\u0146a studij\u0101m paredz\u0113tu iz\u0146\u0113mumus no Augstskolu likuma 56.panta tre\u0161\u0101s da\u013cas, maz\u0101k ierobe\u017eotu augstskolu autonomiju un akad\u0113misko br\u012bv\u012bbu. Likumdev\u0113js nav pien\u0101c\u012bgi izv\u0113rt\u0113jis t\u0101du alternat\u012bvu l\u012bdzek\u013cu es\u012bbu, kuri stud\u0113jo\u0161o, m\u0101c\u012bbsp\u0113ku un augstskolu ties\u012bbas aizskartu maz\u0101k, uzsv\u0113rts spriedum\u0101.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Satversmes tiesa (ST) ir atzinusi par Satversmei neatbilsto\u0161u normu, kas prasa priv\u0101to augstskolu un koled\u017eu studiju programmas \u012bstenot valsts valod\u0101. Tiesa nosprieda, ka normas neatbilst Satversmes 112. un 113. pantam, ta\u010du atsevi\u0161\u0137\u0101 liet\u0101 tiks skat\u012bts jaut\u0101jums par \u0161o normu atbilst\u012bbu Satversmes 1. un 105. pantam. \u0160aj\u0101 liet\u0101 ST apsver iesp\u0113ju v\u0113rsties Eiropas Savien\u012bbas Ties\u0101 (EST) … <\/p>\n